Home mail me! RSS Feed RSS Comments Feed

Is it acupuncture or is it ECT?

Skeptics CircleI came across this article at the BBC about a study that claims that Acupuncture ‘cuts blood pressure’. I found this a little hard to swallow, so I read on.

What the study actually found was Acupuncture combined with electronic stimulation can lower high blood pressure. So wait a minute, they’re sticking needles in rats, then passing an electric current through them. Is that acupuncture? I thought acupuncture was an ancient Chinese healing technique. Since when did the ancient Chinese have electricity?

Either it’s acupuncture, or it’s giving people/rats electric shocks. As far as I can tell there hasn’t been any attempt to test the electric shock treatment on its own, but the article does say: When the acupuncture was applied on its own, it had no effect on blood pressure. So in other words, acupuncture, that ancient chinese healing technique, did nothing.

The lead researcher, Dr Longhurst then goes on to say: “This suggests that acupuncture can be an excellent complement to other medical treatments, especially for those treating the cardiac system.” No, no, wait, it doesn’t suggest anything of the kind. It suggests that giving people mild electric shocks might have some temporary beneficial effect on blood pressure. The only thing it suggests about acupuncture is that it doesn’t do anything.

Misleading headlines like Acupuncture ‘cuts blood pressure’ give people false hope and keep the alternative medicine bandwagon rolling along. Shame on you BBC.

April 29, 2005 @ 1:00 am

carismo said

…but I thought that acupuncture is virtually the only alternative medicine that *does* have some evidence to back up its efficacy. Though, on the other hand, there is also the case of St. John’s Wort, which, in Germany has been prescribed by MD’s as a firstline of defence for depression, ahead of prozac(!), for a good ten years now…

April 29, 2005 @ 7:37 am

lambic said

As far as I know there is no concrete evidence of the efficacy of acupuncture, but I’m not an expert so I’d be happy to be proved wrong. I know a three year study back in the 90s found it to be no better than a placebo.

That wasn’t the point of this post though. The study I’m questioning claimed to show the efficacy of acupuncture when in fact it did no such thing. If there is any evidence that acupuncture has some beneficial value, this study wasn’t it.

April 29, 2005 @ 10:44 am

lambic said

I had a quick look around, and Wikipedia had the best summary of acupuncture research:

The jury is still out on the effectiveness of acupuncture, with existing evidence slightly favouring the proposition that it can be effective in some cases for some conditions. However, almost all the research on the effectiveness of acupuncture is of poor quality and can be criticised on various grounds. Much more research (of a much higher quality) needs to be done before the effectiveness of acupuncture is generally accepted within the medical community.

June 19, 2005 @ 8:29 am

J. Schmidt said

further scientific information about acupuncture:
http://www.gerac.de, site language german, english

October 6, 2006 @ 8:18 am

rob said

acupuncture works, no doubt, for anything

February 22, 2008 @ 12:40 am

Fred said

Several studies have been done on acupuncture.

Here’s another one proving / showing the existence of meridians, the places where acupuncturists place needles.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1810370

February 22, 2008 @ 10:35 am

lambic said

Several studies have been done on acupuncture.

Yes, and none of the well performed ones have found anything beyond placebo.

Here’s another one proving / showing the existence of meridians

Hmm, it’s a bit of a leap to go from finding tiny threadlike structures to calling them meridians.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment