<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I got Streetviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/</link>
	<description>I'm gonna say this once and once only. Stay out of Camberwick Green!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guadagnare e Fare Soldi</title>
		<link>http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/#comment-45073</link>
		<dc:creator>Guadagnare e Fare Soldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/#comment-45073</guid>
		<description>Wow, it looks very neat. I have never heard about this Google tool until now.
I am going to check it out.

On the privacy side, I agree with you, I give Google the benefit of the doubt.

Ciao
Francesco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it looks very neat. I have never heard about this Google tool until now.<br />
I am going to check it out.</p>
<p>On the privacy side, I agree with you, I give Google the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>Ciao<br />
Francesco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephdau</title>
		<link>http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/#comment-44864</link>
		<dc:creator>stephdau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2007/09/i-got-streetviewed/#comment-44864</guid>
		<description>Yeah, check out the links I have in regards to what the Privacy Commissioner's reaction was: http://tekartist.org/blog/2007/09/18/google-street-view-car-downtown-montreal/

What puzzles me is that I haven't seen anything that said the "issue" was resolved, and I read that Immersive Media said they had no cars in Canada, and that the Street View cars have California license plates.

Well, if nothing else, it seems that the picts are at a better resolution when Google runs the capture (see SF v. NYC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, check out the links I have in regards to what the Privacy Commissioner&#8217;s reaction was: <a href="http://tekartist.org/blog/2007/09/18/google-street-view-car-downtown-montreal/" >http://tekartist.org/blog/2007/09/18/google-street-view-car-downtown-montreal/</a></p>
<p>What puzzles me is that I haven&#8217;t seen anything that said the &#8220;issue&#8221; was resolved, and I read that Immersive Media said they had no cars in Canada, and that the Street View cars have California license plates.</p>
<p>Well, if nothing else, it seems that the picts are at a better resolution when Google runs the capture (see SF v. NYC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
