Well that’s ok then…I think.
Recently I had cause to make a work-related inquiry regarding the treatment of some animals. Here is the response I received:
Our company had inquiry from the animal protection group before the same question .
These CAT are left from the first, and they are cats.
It was pitiful, and thought, and [name deleted], author, inherited these.
[name deleted] gave a small cat milk in the change of the parents cat every day.
[name deleted] loved every day, and came to take a picture.
It escalated, and it was made to put on clothes, and a picture was taken.
The backbone of the cat doesn’t break.
Medicine isn’t being used for the cat.
A stand isn’t being stabbed to the cat.
A cat stands up only in a moment.
Person’s many hands are reflected by photo of the photograph.
1980 - 2004 live still by only 1.
Most of the designers of the pet clothes are influenced by [name deleted] though
it is in fashion by the book today to make a pet such as a dog put on
clothes.
Do you think that it has a cute eye like [name deleted] when an author turns the
lens of the camera if cats are in pain and it is severe?
Are you charging the expression of [name deleted] to want you to help it?
Is [name deleted] likely to have loved these cats a little too much?
Thank you for the inquiry.
This is [name deleted], manager.
I am not good at English.
This sentence was made with application of English & Japanese.
Approve it.
[name deleted]
